CSU Harassment Case Highlights CA Rights

Free Case Evaluation

In the Press

Trusted by the
Nation’s Top Media

  • nbc logo
  • BBC logo
  • CNN
  • abc7 logo 1
  • MS Now - logo
  • CBS-Logo
  • Cuomo show logo
  • sunrise logo
  • All in with Chris Hayes logo
  • HLN logo
  • American_Broadcasting_Company_Logo.svg (1)
  • CBSN Los Angeles logo
  • the dr. oz show
  • OprahLogo325x200
  • ricki lake show
  • piers morgan tonight logo
  • Nine_News_logo.svg 1
  • FOX 11 logo
  • Court_TV_2019 1
  • larry king live logo
  • CTV News logo
  • the parnas perspective logo
  • cbc news - logo
  • vassy kapelos show - logo
  • News Nation logo

A recent story out of the California State University system has drawn sharp criticism, and for good reason. It also raises a broader question worth asking: what happens when an employer keeps rewarding someone accused of misconduct?

What Happened at Cal State San Bernardino

Cal State San Bernardino’s outgoing president, Tomás Morales, was approved for a one-year transition assignment paying $343,920, months after CSU settled a lawsuit tied to him for $12 million. Two former administrators, Clare Weber and Anissa Rogers, alleged gender discrimination and harassment that they say was treated as “standard operating procedure” under his leadership.

CSU has said the lawsuit “did not result in any findings against him individually,” and that litigation outcomes don’t determine someone’s standing with the university. That statement is technically accurate. But it also illustrates something many employees run into: settlements often resolve the financial exposure without ever forcing a formal admission of wrongdoing.

Why This Matters Beyond One Case

For employees who’ve experienced harassment, situations like this can feel discouraging. Watching an accused executive receive a six-figure payout, even after a large settlement, might suggest that accountability doesn’t really exist.

It does. It just doesn’t always look the way people expect.

  • A settlement is still a legal acknowledgment that a claim had enough merit to resolve rather than fight.
  • Public employers face additional scrutiny that private companies often avoid, including board oversight and public records requests.
  • Retaliation against employees who report misconduct is a separate, independently actionable claim.

A Los Angeles, CA sexual harassment lawyer employees consult often sees this pattern. The person accused moves on with their career while the people who spoke up are left rebuilding theirs. That imbalance is exactly what employment law exists to address.

What California Employees Should Know

California has some of the strongest workplace protections in the country, and public sector employees have specific avenues for pursuing claims, including through the Civil Rights Department and the courts. Mandated reporting requirements also apply to supervisors and certain staff, meaning failure to report known harassment can carry its own consequences for an institution.

Bloom Fudali has represented employees facing exactly this dynamic: a powerful figure who denies wrongdoing while the institution quietly pays to make the problem go away.

Where Bloom Fudali Fits In

If you’ve experienced harassment at work, whether the accused holds a modest title or runs an entire department, the process for holding someone accountable is available to you. A Los Angeles sexual harassment lawyer can walk you through documentation, timelines, and what a claim might realistically achieve.

Cases like the one at Cal State San Bernardino show that accountability isn’t automatic. It takes someone willing to pursue it. If you’re dealing with harassment or retaliation at work, we’re here to talk through what you’re facing and help you understand your options.

Reach Out Today

Tell Us About Your Case

To learn about your legal options, submit this form. Our firm responds to all requests promptly. We look forward to working with you.